Ir al contenido principal

Is religion abuse?

Homeopathy is staring down a barrel. The European authorities have decided that there is no scientific evidence that it works, in spite of the anecdotal evidence of millions of patients who claim that it has cured their ailments. A placebo effect? Maybe. Worse than tobacco? Probably not.  In fact, given that using this kind of medicine is a free choice and the information about the risks or lacks of guarantees is so widespread that it is hard to suggest that anyone is being led down a blind alley.

Not so the case with traditional religions. I would argue that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to argue that religions are not imposed on their adherents in highly abusive ways and that they need to be combated with the same strength as other forms of emotional coercion.

Let's start with the scientific evidence. Obviously, there is no proof that any of the beliefs: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. have even a grain of truth to them or that they are anything less than instruments used by authority to exercise power through coercion and fear. And what is worse is that they are imposed from a very young age, before citizens have the capacity to reason. In the specific case of Christianity, the whole belief system is based on the choice between chosing 'the path of good' and submitting to the demands of the Church, or being led by temptation to stray towards 'the path of evil' which in the book of Genesis is equated with 'knowledge'. Ie. the very education which is supposed to enlighten us and set us free is 'evil' and if as a result of this we come to the conclusion that the beliefs we have been taught as kids are little more than mumbo jumbo, we will always be haunted by the fear that we are straying from God.

I have no problem with the essence of God, in the sense of there being a higher power or force of nature, and that this power can be felt and identified by any sentient being on his journey through life. Nevertheless, this has to be a permanent discovery, sought through experience and without other human beings using it as a tool for oppression. And this is exactly what religions do. They profess to know the truth and to use it for the sake of social control. Once we recognise this, -and all the more so when religion is being used as an argument for mass slaughter- the State has the obligation to step in and prevent this falsehood and abuse.

Until we reach this stage, I suggest they leave the homeopaths in peace. In comparison to the works of the priests, rabbis and imams of this world, theirs is at the most a very minor misdemeanour



Entradas populares de este blog

PR in times of cholera

How do PR professionals, companies, organisations or plain individuals cut through the noise in the era of social media? This will be one of the key questions in 2018, and even more so at a time when ideas and opinions are so easily misconstrued and a simple misthought phrase can lead to Trumpian noise and fury on Twitter or, indeed, elsewhere.

It would seem that this is not a time for pushing boundaries. A simple mis-step and you have a full blown global brand identity crisis. Yet somehow brands need to differentiate themselves and make themselves stand up above mediocrity and reflect something their audiences want to hear.

Step into the fray Virgin Trains, which this week performed some marvellous 'virtue signalling' by banning free copies of the Daily Mail for its First Class Passengers. This led to some to notice the irony of this occuring just at a time when this publication had been criticising the poor service quality of the British privatised rail service. In any event…

El fallo del juez de Schleswig-Holstein denota el fracaso de Rajoy, no el de la Unión Europea

Hoy desayuno con los editoriales de los principales medios españoles, y casi me atraganto al observar que tras el fallo de ayer de un tribunal alemán sobre la extradición de Puigdemont, el país se ha vuelto euroescéptico de la noche a la mañana.

Desde luego, la decisión del juez no es agradable para los que defendemos el mantenimiento del orden constitucional en España, sin embargo, no hay que otorgar al fallo un significado que no tiene. Y más aún si se tiene en cuenta la sensibilidad de estos temas para una opinión pública, que leyendo  la prensa nacional fácilmente podría llegar a la conclusión de que lo que ha pasado ayer es culpa de las instituciones comunitarias.

Nada más lejos de la realidad. El tema de si o no hubo violencia en el Procés es cuestionable y cuestionado . Y más discutible aún el de si se puede culpar al ex presidente de la Generalitat por dicha violencia. Parece que el tribunal regional alemán competente en este caso ha llegado a la conclusión de que no. Y es pe…

La Generación X - y la "X", ¿qué significaba?

Cuando de pequeño descubrí que los profesionales de marketing habían encasillado a mi y a los que nacieron en la misma época en un grupo denominado la Generación X, me preguntaba qué era el significado de esa letra. Por muy pequeño que fuese, sospeché que el significante tendría algún significado, más allá del sonido de ese consonante malsonante.Sin embargo, he tenido que esperar más de cuatro décadas para confirmar que aquella X, en efecto, representaba el vacío. O lo que es peor, el engaño. Y es probable que en los próximos años veamos con horror hasta qué punto nos vendaron los ojos a los de mi generación y con consecuencias trágicas para el futuro de la humanidad.Sí. Nos mintieron. Cada 11 de noviembre, a las 11:00 h nos llevaban a los de mi clase a un memorial levantado al final del campo de fútbol de mi colegio, al borde del río, en homenaje a todos los antiguos alumnos fallecidos en la "Gran Guerra". Aquella guerra, que mi profesor -un ex mayor retirado del ejército- …