Ir al contenido principal

Hard Brexit or no Brexit: Calling bluff on this (not so) Scottish play

Being English, naturalised Spanish and living in Spain, sometimes it is difficult to know what position to take on Brexit. Seen from afar, the spectacle of a country self destructing over an issue that could have been avoided, -had David Cameron been more statesmanlike and avoided basing national policy over such a fundamental issue purely on the interests of his party-, is at the very least fascinating. One British (well, admittedly, Scottish...) commentator told me how exciting it was to watch, comparing it to a train crash in slow motion. Given how tiresome the country's eurosceptic mob has become over so many years, it is not difficult for that German word schadenfreude to come clearly into view when contemplating which of all the negative or not so negative scenarios for the country could possibly end up top should they fulfil the dirtiest of their fantasies.

Among those scenarios are options ranging from slow decline to forecasts of something not far short of the Apocalypse. Clearly none of those options are desirable and given the sore state of Europe in general, with an increasing number of populist governments and overt hostility coming from across the Atlantic, any form of Brexit will benefit nobody. Yet, given how absolutely pig headed those in power in Westminster have been over the last few years, it is perhaps understandable to wish they just get on with it, stop trying to keep one foot in the door and go down the hole they have dug for themselves once and for all.

This sounds pretty awful, especially when you have a stake in whatever is the outcome thanks to links and relationships on both sides of the divide. However it is increasingly becoming clear that a  fudge would not be of any benefit to either side. Anything that looks like cherry picking or as the Italians would say, "volere la botte piena e la moglie ubriaca," as some in the British cabinet seem to desire, would lead to similar demands across the EU and would put an end to any likelihood of salvaging whatever remains of the European project. And meanwhile in the UK, any deal that allows them to keep up the appearance of having left the EU with little pain would only strengthen the hand of the pro-Brexit media while ensuring that the more fundamentalist of Tory politicians continue to complain that the government has sold the country down the river and failed to make a clear break.

That is not to say of course that we really dream of the country going down the road to perdition. From my own perspective the ideal result would be for voters at some stage in the process to experience a  moment of lucidity, see what they are doing to themselves and cancel the whole rotten enterprise. This of course begs the question of whether, having seen what they are capable of,  anyone else in the EU would want the UK back on board. For heaven's sake, we've already got the Hungarians, Austrians and Italians to deal with! Yet, to coin a phrase, precisely for this reason I assume most people would rather have the UK on the inside pissing out than on the outside pissing in. For pissing the other way round, Putin and Trump, and that is two too many.

Yet just as May insists, Brexit is Brexit and jumping is jumping; and if they insist on jumping, regrettable as it is, it is their own sovereign division. All we can do for the moment is, through soothing words, firm pressure or a combination of both, try to talk them out of it.

Entradas populares de este blog

PR in times of cholera

How do PR professionals, companies, organisations or plain individuals cut through the noise in the era of social media? This will be one of the key questions in 2018, and even more so at a time when ideas and opinions are so easily misconstrued and a simple misthought phrase can lead to Trumpian noise and fury on Twitter or, indeed, elsewhere.

It would seem that this is not a time for pushing boundaries. A simple mis-step and you have a full blown global brand identity crisis. Yet somehow brands need to differentiate themselves and make themselves stand up above mediocrity and reflect something their audiences want to hear.

Step into the fray Virgin Trains, which this week performed some marvellous 'virtue signalling' by banning free copies of the Daily Mail for its First Class Passengers. This led to some to notice the irony of this occuring just at a time when this publication had been criticising the poor service quality of the British privatised rail service. In any event…

El fallo del juez de Schleswig-Holstein denota el fracaso de Rajoy, no el de la Unión Europea

Hoy desayuno con los editoriales de los principales medios españoles, y casi me atraganto al observar que tras el fallo de ayer de un tribunal alemán sobre la extradición de Puigdemont, el país se ha vuelto euroescéptico de la noche a la mañana.

Desde luego, la decisión del juez no es agradable para los que defendemos el mantenimiento del orden constitucional en España, sin embargo, no hay que otorgar al fallo un significado que no tiene. Y más aún si se tiene en cuenta la sensibilidad de estos temas para una opinión pública, que leyendo  la prensa nacional fácilmente podría llegar a la conclusión de que lo que ha pasado ayer es culpa de las instituciones comunitarias.

Nada más lejos de la realidad. El tema de si o no hubo violencia en el Procés es cuestionable y cuestionado . Y más discutible aún el de si se puede culpar al ex presidente de la Generalitat por dicha violencia. Parece que el tribunal regional alemán competente en este caso ha llegado a la conclusión de que no. Y es pe…

A saber

Existe una izquierda que se opone a los fallos judiciales en su país cuando no coinciden con su ideología, y al mismo tiempo se enfada cuando Israel gana Eurovisión con una canción que refleja sus postulados.La misma izquierda detesta el único estado democrático de Oriente Medio por los excesos militares de sus líderes, pero se calla cuando su propio gobierno vende armas a Arabia Saudí o avala bombardeos en Siria.Se trata de una izquierda compuesta por personas que no saben reflexionar o analizar la realidad de una manera objetiva, sino que se pliega ante la dictadura de la 'opinión pública' y lo políticamente correcto.Una izquierda que prefiere opinar antes de aprender, porque este requiere esfuerzo y es mucho más fácil sumarse a la lógica de las masas.También existe una derecha que cree saber la verdad, que cuando gobierna impone su punto de vista en la sociedad e intenta eliminar cualquier atisbo de discrepancia en pro del pensamiento único, en línea con su dogma universal,…